top of page

Why You Can't Own AI-Generated Content

The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) has led to an increase in AI-generated content, including images, art, music, and written text. However, the question of ownership and copyright protection for such content remains a complex and contentious issue. Let's explore the reasons why you can't own AI-generated content and provide examples to illustrate the challenges involved.

Copyright Laws and AI-Generated Content

Copyright laws are designed to protect the intellectual property of human creators. However, AI-generated content is produced by an inert entity using an algorithm, which means it does not fall under copyright protection. As of today, there are no copyright laws that specifically address AI-generated content, and the situation is still solved on a case-by-case basis in court.

Examples of AI-Generated Content and Ownership Issues

  1. AI-generated images: Companies like OpenAI and StabilityAI have released AI-enabled text and image generators, leading to an increase in requests to copyright works with AI. However, the US Copyright Office has ruled that images produced by giving a text prompt to generative AI models, such as Midjourney or Stable Diffusion, cannot be copyrighted.

  2. AI-generated text: ChatGPT, an AI language model developed by OpenAI, can generate human-like text based on input prompts. However, determining ownership of the content generated by ChatGPT is particularly difficult, as it is unclear whether the requester or OpenAI should hold the copyright.

  3. AI-generated art: The sale of "Edmond de Belamy," a portrait generated by AI, for $432,500 in an auction raised questions about the copyright status of AI-generated art. However, as mentioned earlier, copyright laws do not currently protect creations wholly generated by AI.

  4. AI-generated albums: In 2018, Taryn Southern released the first music album entirely created by AI, titled "I Am AI." Southern used IBM Watson BEAT to generate the music, running 1800 revolution-era, out-of-copyright songs through the program to circumvent potential copyright issues.

  5. AI-generated songs: AI tools like Stable Diffusion can be used to create songs in the style of existing artists, raising questions about whether these creations infringe on the original artists' copyrights.

As AI continues to advance and generate more sophisticated content, the legal landscape surrounding copyright and ownership will likely evolve. Some experts argue that AI is simply a tool, and the human directing the AI should be able to claim ownership of the output. However, this perspective may not be universally accepted, and the concept of independent creation could preclude two parties whose queries generated the same work from enforcing rights against each other.

The current legal framework does not allow for the ownership of AI-generated content, as copyright laws are designed to protect human creations. However, as AI continues to develop and its impact on various industries grows, it is possible that the legal landscape surrounding AI-generated content and copyright will evolve to address these challenges.


bottom of page